Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients' experience with Radium-223 treatment in Japan.

Aim: We aimed to determine Japanese metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients' Ra-223 treatment experience. Patients & methods: Patients answered the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ domains: Satisfaction with Therapy [SWT], Expectations of Therapy [ET], Feelings about Side Effects [FSE]), the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) and the FACT-Bone Pain (FACT-BP) Questionnaire at baseline, during (vists 3 and 5) and after treatment (end of observation; EOO). Results: Data from 72 patients were included. Baseline median CTSQ scores SWT: 66.1 (IQR19.7), ET: 75.0 (IQR45), and FSE 68.8 (IQR 34.4) were unchanged during vists 3 and 5, but the SWT (-3.57 [IQR17.9]) and ET (-5.0 [IQR30]) decreased while FSE was unchanged (0.0 [IQR31.25]) at EOO. The median MAX-PC (18.0 [IQR 49]) score was unchanged (0.0, IQR 6) while the median FACT BP (54.0 [IQR13]) score decreased by -1.0 (IQR 8) at EOO. Conclusion: Japanese metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients' experience is stable during Ra-223 treatment.

What is this study about? We wanted to know the treatment experience with Radium-223 (Ra-223) among Japanese prostate cancer patients. Ra-223 is a radioactive molecule used for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. We asked patients to answer different questionnaires on treatment satisfaction, anxiety and quality of life before, during, and after treatment with Ra-223. What were the results? Based on the patients' answers to our questionnaires, treatment satisfaction, anxiety and quality of life remain stable while the patients undergo treatment with Ra-223, but in some aspects may decline after treatment. What do the results mean? The results mean that patients' experience during Ra-223 treatment is stable but patients should share any concerns they have about their treatment with their doctors.

Radium-223 in women with hormone receptor-positive bone-metastatic breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy: pooled analysis of two international, phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Most women with advanced breast cancer have skeletal metastases. Radium-223 is an alpha-emitting radionuclide that selectively targets areas of bone metastases. METHODS: Two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of radium-223 were conducted in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), bone-predominant metastatic breast cancer. All patients received endocrine therapy (ET), as a single agent of the investigator's choice (Study A) or exemestane + everolimus (Study B). Patients were randomized to receive radium-223 (55 kBq/kg) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for six doses. Accrual was halted following unblinded interim analyses per protocol amendments, and both studies were terminated. We report pooled analyses of symptomatic skeletal event-free survival (SSE-FS; primary endpoint), radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS; secondary), and time to bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP) progression (exploratory). RESULTS: In total, 382 patients were enrolled, and 196 SSE-FS events (70% planned total) were recorded. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) and nominal p values for radium-223 + ET versus placebo + ET were: SSE-FS 0.809 (0.610-1.072), p = 0.1389; rPFS 0.956 (0.759-1.205), p = 0.7039; OS 0.889 (0.660-1.199), p = 0.4410; and time to bone ALP progression 0.593 (0.379-0.926), p = 0.0195. Radium-223- or placebo-related treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 50.3% versus 35.1% of patients (grade 3/4: 25.7% vs. 8.5%), with fractures/bone-associated events in 23.5% versus 23.9%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HR+ bone-metastatic breast cancer, numeric differences favoring radium-223 + ET over placebo + ET for the primary SSE-FS endpoint were suggestive of efficacy, in line with the primary outcome measure used in the underlying phase 2 studies. No similar evidence of efficacy was observed for secondary progression or survival endpoints. Adverse events were more frequent with radium-223 + ET versus placebo + ET, but the safety profile of the combination was consistent with the safety profiles of the component drugs. Clinical trial registration numbers Study A: NCT02258464, registered October 7, 2014. Study B: NCT02258451, registered October 7, 2014.

A potential biomarker of radiosensitivity in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with combination external beam radiotherapy and radium-223.

PURPOSE: The ADRRAD trial reported the safety and feasibility of the combination of external beam radiotherapy and radium-223 in the treatment of de novo bone metastatic prostate. This study aimed to determine if any biomarkers predictive of response to these treatments could be identified. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 30 patients with newly diagnosed bone metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer were recruited to the ADRRAD trial. Blood samples were taken pre-treatment, before cycles 2 to 6 of radium-223, and 8 weeks and 6 months after treatment. Mononuclear cells were isolated and DNA damage was assessed at all timepoints. RESULTS: DNA damage was increased in all patients during treatment, with bigger increases in foci observed in patients who relapsed late compared to those who relapsed early. Increases in DNA damage during the radium-223 only cycles of treatment were specifically related to response in these patients. Analysis of hematology counts also showed bigger decreases in red blood cell and hemoglobin counts in patients who experienced later biochemical relapse. CONCLUSIONS: While some patients responded to this combination treatment, others relapsed within one year of treatment initiation. This study identifies a biomarker based approach that may be useful in predicting which patients will respond to treatment, by monitoring both increases in DNA damage above baseline levels in circulating lymphocytes and decreases in red blood cell and hemoglobin counts during treatment.

177Lu-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Prior 223Ra (RALU Study).

223Ra-dichloride (223Ra) and 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) are approved treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The safety and effectiveness of sequential use of 223Ra and 177Lu-PSMA in patients with mCRPC are not well described. This study aimed to evaluate 177Lu-PSMA safety and efficacy in patients with mCRPC previously treated with 223Ra. Methods: The radium→lutetium (RALU) study was a multicenter, retrospective, medical chart review. Participants had received at least 1 223Ra dose and, in any subsequent therapy line, at least 1 177Lu-PSMA dose. Primary endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, grade 3-4 hematologic AEs, and abnormal laboratory values. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, time to next treatment/death, and change from baseline in serum prostate-specific antigen and alkaline phosphatase levels. Results: Data were from 133 patients. Before 177Lu-PSMA therapy, 56% (75/133) of patients received at least 4 life-prolonging therapies; all patients received 223Ra (73% received 5-6 injections). Overall, 27% (36/133) of patients received at least 5 177Lu-PSMA infusions. Any-grade treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 79% (105/133) of patients and serious AEs in 30% (40/133). The most frequent grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities were anemia (30%, 40/133) and thrombocytopenia (13%, 17/133). Median overall survival was 13.2 mo (95% CI, 10.5-15.6 mo) from the start of 177Lu-PSMA. Conclusion: In this real-world setting, 223Ra followed by 177Lu-PSMA therapy in heavily pretreated patients with mCRPC was clinically feasible, with no indication of impairment of 177Lu-PSMA safety or effectiveness.

Integrating radium-223 therapy into the management of metastatic prostate cancer care: a plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: Few life-prolonging treatment options are available for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This article provides an overview of the current systemic treatments available for mCRPC and reviews studies that investigate the optimal timing for the use of radium-223. The aim is to illustrate possible systemic treatment sequences to maximize benefit from radium-223 therapy. WHAT IS METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER & HOW IS IT TREATED?: Prostate cancer is called mCRPC when it spreads to organs outside of the prostate (such as the lymph nodes, bones, liver, or lungs) and no longer responds to hormonal therapy. There are several treatment options available for mCRPC, such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, radium-223, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, olaparib, rucaparib, sipuleucel-T, and 177Lu-PSMA. It is important to understand the risks and benefits associated with each treatment and whether current use may have an impact on future treatment options, including eligibility in certain clinical trials. Maintaining bone health is also an important part of prostate cancer care. WHAT IS RADIUM-223?: Radium-223 is a radioactive molecule that releases strong radiation within a very small range around itself. It mainly travels to the bone where the prostate cancer has spread and kills the cancer cells in that area. Results from a clinical study named ALSYMPCA showed that men who received radium-223 lived longer in addition to having less bone pain. The most common side effects of radium-223 are nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Radium-223 minimally suppresses the bone marrow, which means that it slightly reduces the levels of red and white blood cells.

The safety of radium-223 combined with new-generation hormonal agents in bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) might benefit from radium-223 (223Ra) combined with new-generation hormonal agents (NHAs) in terms of survival and quality of life (QoL). However, the safety of combination therapies remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to perform a network meta-analysis by reviewing the literature about the combination of 223Ra with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) or enzalutamide and to evaluate the safety of combination therapy in bone mCRPC patients. Ultimately, ten studies (2835 patients) were selected, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), five retrospective cohort studies, and one single-arm study. Overall, there was no difference in the incidence of fracture between the 223Ra+NHA combination group and the 223Ra monotherapy group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-2.34, P = 0.66), but the incidences in both the 223Ra+NHA combination group (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 2.24-4.63, P < 0.01) and the 223Ra monotherapy group (OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.23-4.08, P < 0.01) were higher than that in the NHA monotherapy group. However, in the meta-analysis involving only RCTs, there was no difference between the 223Ra monotherapy group and the NHA monotherapy group (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.22-5.95, P = 0.88), while the difference between the 223Ra+NHA combination group and the NHA monotherapy group remained significant (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 2.24-4.63, P < 0.01). Symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs), SSE-free survival (SSE-FS), all grades of common adverse events (AEs), and ≥grade 3 AEs among all groups did not show any significant difference. Our results indicate that the combination of 223Ra with NHAs was well tolerated in bone mCRPC patients compared to 223Ra monotherapy, even though the incidence of fracture was higher in patients who received 223Ra than that among those who received NHA monotherapy. More evidence is needed to explore the safety and efficiency of 223Ra combination therapies.

Role of radium-223 discontinuation due to adverse events in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. A retrospective monocentric analysis.

BACKGROUND: Radium 223 (Ra-223) was approved for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with bone-only disease, following demonstration of significant improvement in overall survival (OS). To date, there are no validated prognostic factors useful in predicting outcome of mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223. Our retrospective study aims to evaluate the prognostic role of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events in mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223, and to identify which factors correlate with the toxicity onset. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 from September 2013 to December 2019 at our institute. Patients were divided in 2 groups according to the reason of Ra-223 therapy discontinuation: toxicity versus other causes. Outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. RESULTS: In the overall population (75 patients) median PFS and OS were 5.46 months and 11.15 months respectively. Patients who discontinued treatment due to toxicity had a lower median PFS (3.49 vs 5.89 months, HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.14-3.12, p = 0.014) and OS (8.59 vs 14.7 months HR: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.85-6.01, p < 0.001) than patients who discontinued therapy due to other causes. The risk of Ra-223 discontinuation due to toxicity correlates with the number of previous treatments (p = 0.002), previous chemotherapy treatment (p = 0.039), baseline LDH (p = 0.012), Hb (p = 0.021) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation due to toxicity is associated with worse outcomes in mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223. To reduce the risk of developing toxicities that may compromise treatment efficacy, Ra-223 should be used early in mCRPC patients.

Effectiveness and safety of radium-223 dichloride in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases in real-world practice: A multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: Radium-223 (Ra-223) dichloride is the bone-targeted radioligand therapy that prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with bone-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this treatment in real-world practice. METHODS: We included Japanese men treated with Ra-223 for bone-metastatic CRPC from 10 institutions, retrospectively. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoint was maximum decline of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase, and prostate-specific antigen values, the rate of adverse events, and time to pathological fracture after Ra-223 treatment. Exploratory endpoint was the associations between clinical parameters and OS. RESULTS: In total, 73 men with bone metastatic CRPC treated with Ra-223 were enrolled. The median OS was 20.9 months. ALP levels decreased significantly from pre-treatment (p = 0.03). Anemia occurred in three (4.1%) patients. Grade ≥ 3 non-pathological fractures occurred in four (5.5%) men. Nine (12.3%) patients presented pathological fracture; 7/30 (23.3%) were in men without concomitant use of a bone-modifying agent (BMA) while 2/43 (4.7%) were in patients with concomitant BMA (p = 0.03). The median OS in patients with ≥3 cycles treatment (27.2 months, p < 0.001) or hemoglobin ≥12 g/dl (27.2 months, p = 0.001) or absence of bone pain (36.3 months, p = 0.004) was significantly longer compared to those who with ≤2 cycles or hemoglobin<12 g/dl or presence of bone paint, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown the outcomes of Ra-223 treatment in real-world practice, where the number of treatment cycles, baseline anemia and bone pain may be useful to predict OS in Ra-223 treatment.

Phase I Study of Niraparib in Combination with Radium-223 for the Treatment of Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify the safety of niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, in combination with Radium-223 for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men without known BRCA mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with progressive mCPRC following ≥1 line of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy and bone metastases but no documented BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 alterations or bulky visceral disease were included. Niraparib dose was escalated in combination with standard dosing of Radium-223 using a time-to-event continual reassessment method. The highest dose level with a DLT probability <20% was defined as MTD. Secondary endpoints included PSA change and progression-free survival. Exploratory analyses included assessing DNA mutations found in ctDNA as well as gene expression changes assessed in whole blood samples. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated with niraparib and radium-223: 13 patients received 100 mg, 12 received 200 mg, and 5 patients received 300 mg of niraparib. There were six DLT events: two (13%) for neutropenia, two (13%) for thrombocytopenia, whereas fatigue and nausea each occurred once (3%). Anemia (2/13%) and neutropenia (2/13%) were the most common grade 3 adverse events. For patients with prior chemotherapy exposure, the MTD was 100 mg, whereas the MTD for chemotherapy naïve patients was 200 mg. Whole blood gene expression of PAX5 and CD19 was higher in responders and ARG-1, IL2R, and FLT3 expression was higher in nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Combining niraparib with Radium-223 in patients with mCRPC was safe; however, further studies incorporating biomarkers will better elucidate the role of combinations of PARP inhibitors with DNA damaging and other agents.

Safety and Survival Outcomes of 177Lu-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with Prior 223Ra treatment: The RALU Study.

The radium lutetium (RALU) study evaluated the feasibility of sequential α- and ß-emitter use in patients with bone-predominant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods: This preplanned interim retrospective analysis investigated safety and survival outcomes with 177Lu-PSMA in patients treated with prior 223Ra. Results: Forty-nine patients were evaluated. Patients received a median of 6 223Ra injections; 59% of patients received at least 4 177Lu-PSMA cycles. Most (69%) patients received at least 4 life-prolonging therapies before 177Lu-PSMA. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events during 177Lu-PSMA therapy and a 30-d follow-up period included anemia (18%) and thrombocytopenia (2%). Median overall survival was 12.6 mo (95% CI, 8.8-16.1 mo) and 31.4 mo (95% CI, 25.7-37.6 mo) from starting 177Lu-PSMA or 223Ra, respectively. Conclusion: 177Lu-PSMA treatment was well tolerated in patients who had received prior 223Ra. 223Ra use before 177Lu-PSMA is feasible and can be considered for future assessment of the optimal treatment sequence.

Efficacy and Safety of Radium-223 for Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer With Bone Metastasis Before and After Docetaxel.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radium-223 (Ra-223) therapy provides a survival benefit for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with bone metastasis. The optimal timing of using Ra-223 has not been determined. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ra-223 before and after docetaxel (DOC) therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 36 CRPC patients with bone metastasis who were treated with Ra-223 in our institution and satellite hospitals. Ra-223 was used before DOC (pre-DOC group) in 17 patients (47%) and after DOC (post-DOC group) in 19 patients (53%). The treatment completion rate of 6 cycles, progression-free survival (PFS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and occurrence rate of adverse events were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 45 months. In the pre-DOC compared with the post-DOC group, treatment completion rate was significantly higher (94% vs. 52%, p<0.01), PFS was significantly longer (median: 8 vs. 5 months, p=0.024) and CSS was significantly longer (median: 32 vs. 15 months, p=0.028). The difference in CSS was significant in multivariate analysis. In the pre-DOC compared with the post-DOC group, the occurrence rate of grade ≥3 adverse events tended to be lower (6% vs. 36%, p=0.322), and the CSS tended to be longer (median: not reached vs. 45 months, p=0.208). CONCLUSION: Ra-223 could be used more safely and more effectively for CRPC patients with bone metastasis before than after DOC therapy.

[Retrospective practice-related care research study on therapy of mCPRC with radium-223 dichloride]. / Retrospektive Versorgungsstudie von d-uo zur Therapie des mCRPC mit Radium-223-dichlorid.

During phase III study ERA-223, patients under combination therapy with radium-223 and abiraterone showed an increased risk of bone fractures and a possible higher risk of death. This observation led to a change in the German therapeutic guidelines in 2018. Radium-223 is now only allowed as a third-line monotherapy (besides ADT) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with symptomatic bone lesions without known visceral metastases or for patients with mCRPC, for whom no other available systematic therapy is suitable. Since almost no data on practice-related care research on the use of radium-223 exist, we consulted members of d-uo (German Uro-Oncologists) over their therapy algorithms. This study analysed data of patients treated with radium-223 between 2014 and 2019. It could be shown that 50% of mCRPC-patients had received radium-223 in the past as third-line therapy. Half of these were treated in combination with new androgen receptor targeted therapies (ARTA) and no increase in bone fractures was observed. This was most likely due to the additional use of bone protecting agents. Despite the late cancer stage, treatment response was seen in almost half of the patients.

Ocular complications with the use of radium-223: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Radium-223 is used for the treatment of osseous metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer, and has been shown to increase time to the first skeletal-related event, reduce the rate of hospitalization, and improve quality of life. It is well tolerated, with hematologic toxicity as the main adverse event. Thus far, no ocular complication has been reported in the literature after initial administration of radium-223 with a single case reported of ocular complications after a patient's second course of radium-223. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We present three cases of ocular complications after the use of radium-223 in patients with metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma. Ocular complications presented as blurry vision, and formal diagnosis included uveitis and hyphema. CONCLUSIONS: Documentation of adverse events is exceedingly important due to the high incidence of metastatic prostate cancer and increasing interest for the use of radium-223 in other osteoblastic disease. The authors postulate that these ocular complications may be a result of radiation's potential effect on neovascularization, polypharmacy, or the biomolecular effects of radium-223 on integral signaling proteins, potentially coupled with poor underlying ocular health.

Radium-223 in the Treatment of Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Background Radium 223 (Ra-223) has been successfully utilised for the treatment of men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To date, no real world outcomes from its use in the Irish population have been described. Methods All men referred to our institution for Ra-223 from September 2016 to March 2019 were included. Patient demographics, treatments received, toxicities and outcomes were recorded. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Complete data was available for 54 men. Median age was 75 years (range 61-86 years). The median number of prior systemic treatments for mCRPC was 2 (range 0-4). Median ECOG performance status was 1 at the start of treatment and 2 at completion. The median number of Ra-223 cycles received was 4 with 37%(n=20) completing all 6 planned cycles. The most common treatment-related toxicity was fatigue seen in 52% of patients ( n=28). Improved pain scores were documented in 76% of men requiring opioid analgesia at the start of treatment. The median OS was 7 months. A good ECOG performance status, fewer than 6 bone metastases, normal alkaline phosphatase level at start of treatment and chemotherapy naivety were associated with improved OS. Conclusions Ra-223 is a moderately well tolerated palliative treatment amongst Irish men with mCRPC.

A single arm phase II study of bone-targeted Sn-117 m-DTPA in symptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with skeletal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Several bone-seeking radionuclides have been developed for palliation of metastatic bone pain since 1956, however, so far radium-223 dichloride is the first and only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved targeted alpha therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) based on ALSYMPCA phase 3 study. While radium-223 does improve pain and overall survival outcomes, the improvement can come at the expense of side effects such as bone marrow toxicity. The development of new and better treatment with long-standing pain relief is clearly an unmet medical need. METHODS: The study is a non-randomized phase II study. The study population consists of 25 patients with CRPC who had progressed on any lines of prior therapies and whose serum testosterone level is less than 50 ng/dl and have metastatic lesions to at least two bone sites, with at least one site that has clinically meaningful pain at baseline (≥ 4 on an 11-point intensity scale). Eligible patients will be given two cycles of Sn-117 m-DTPA every 8 weeks or 56 days. Treatment will be administered by slow IV injection over 5-10 min. Retreatment after two cycles is allowed if patients meet the following retreatment criteria. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of Sn-117 m-DTPA on sustained pain response in patients with CRPC metastatic to at least two bone sites and at least one with clinically meaningful pain at baseline (≥ 4 on an 11-point pain intensity scale). Sustained pain response is defined as: 1) achieving pain index ≤ 3 within a 12-week period and 2) maintaining pain index ≤ 3 over a 16-week period. The secondary objectives are: safety and tolerability, measurement of Sn-117 m-DTPA activity by gamma-camera dosimetry scans, therapeutic efficacy, time to the first symptomatic skeletal event, duration of pain response, changes in PSA and ALP levels, patient-reported outcomes and progression free survival and overall survival. DISCUSSION: Sn-117 m-DTPA is a unique bone-targeting theranostic radiopharmaceutical agent that selectively binds most heavily to bone metastases sites. This study will be the first prospective phase II trial to assess the pain efficacy and anti-tumor activity of Sn-117 m-DTPA in mCRPC with at least one clinically meaningful pain at baseline. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincialTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04616547.

Radium-223 Dichloride in Peritoneal Dialysate Following Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Radium-223 dichloride was administrated to a patient with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing in-home peritoneal dialysis. The peritoneal dialysate and tubing sets were collected following four treatment cycles and analyzed for removable contamination, dose rate, and radioactivity. The purpose of the study was to assess radiation safety concerns and compare data with patients having normal renal function. Sixty-two liters of dialysate in 22 samples were collected over 4 mo. The mean surface dose rate of the dialysate bags was 0.16 µSv h-1 (range 0.11-0.23 µSv h-1). The highest measured removable surface activity was 150 dpm per 100 cm2. The mean cumulative percent of administered activity was 1.7% (range 1.4-1.9%). The mean concentration of 223Ra in dialysate was 4.0 kBq L-1 (range 0.56-14.1 kBq L-1). There was no association between the measured 223Ra activity in dialysate with peritoneal dwell time or the number of exchanges following administration. The measurement of the 211Bi and 223Ra ratio in the dialysate compared with a standard showed an increase of 23% by 40 h post administration. The data presented suggest that 223Ra dialysate can be safely managed in the home without risk of radiation dose or contamination if minimal precautions are taken. Patients with normal renal function have been shown to excrete up to six times more 223Ra in urine compared to those undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. A potential consequence may be an increase in 223Ra activity transiting GI tract leading to intestinal effects.

Integrated analysis of pain, health-related quality of life, and analgesic use in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium-223.

BACKGROUND: Radium-223 (Ra-223), an alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical, established an improved overall survival and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. However, effects on pain were not specifically evaluated. Here we assess integrated HRQoL, pain, and opioid use in a contemporary, more extensively pretreated, symptomatic and asymptomatic mCRPC population. METHODS: mCRPC patients scheduled for Ra-223 treatment were included and analyzed for HRQoL, pain, and opioid use, using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaires and recording of opioid use and dosage, respectively. Primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients experiencing a complete pain response (score of 0 on the BPI-SF Worst pain item and no increase in daily use of analgesics). A complete or partial pain response (better BPI-SF score and decrease in opioid use) and a better or no change in HRQoL was evaluated as an integrated overall clinical response (IOCR). Secondary endpoints included the time to pain progression (TPP) and Total FACT-P deterioration (TTFD), defined as time from first Ra-223 treatment to clinical meaningful increase in BPI-SF Worst pain item score and Total FACT-P score, respectively. RESULTS: This registry included 300 patients, of whom 105 (35%) were evaluable for FACT-P and BPI-SF during Ra-223 treatment. Forty-five (43%) patients had pain at baseline (PAB) (BPI-SF Worst pain score 5-10 points) and 60 (57%) had no pain at baseline (no-PAB) (BPI-SF Worst pain score 0-4 points). Complete pain response was achieved in 31.4% of the patients, while 58% had an IOCR. The median TTP and TTFD were 5.6 and 5.7 months, respectively, while the difference between PAB and no-PAB patients was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary, extensively pretreated mCRPC patients, Ra-223 treatment induced complete pain responses while integrated analysis of HRQoL, pain response, and opioid use demonstrated that the majority of patients derive clinical benefit.